Multithreaded Generation¶
The four core distributions (random
,
standard_normal
, standard_exponential
,
and standard_gamma
) all allow existing arrays to be filled
using the out
keyword argument. Existing arrays need to be contiguous and
well-behaved (writable and aligned). Under normal circumstances, arrays
created using the common constructors such as numpy.empty
will satisfy
these requirements.
This example makes use of Python 3 concurrent.futures
to fill an array
using multiple threads. Threads are long-lived so that repeated calls do not
require any additional overheads from thread creation. The underlying
BitGenerator is PCG64 which is fast, has a long period and supports
using PCG64.jumped to return a new generator while advancing the
state. The random numbers generated are reproducible in the sense that the same
seed will produce the same outputs.
from numpy.random import Generator, PCG64
import multiprocessing
import concurrent.futures
import numpy as np
class MultithreadedRNG(object):
def __init__(self, n, seed=None, threads=None):
rg = PCG64(seed)
if threads is None:
threads = multiprocessing.cpu_count()
self.threads = threads
self._random_generators = [rg]
last_rg = rg
for _ in range(0, threads-1):
new_rg = last_rg.jumped()
self._random_generators.append(new_rg)
last_rg = new_rg
self.n = n
self.executor = concurrent.futures.ThreadPoolExecutor(threads)
self.values = np.empty(n)
self.step = np.ceil(n / threads).astype(np.int_)
def fill(self):
def _fill(random_state, out, first, last):
random_state.standard_normal(out=out[first:last])
futures = {}
for i in range(self.threads):
args = (_fill,
self._random_generators[i],
self.values,
i * self.step,
(i + 1) * self.step)
futures[self.executor.submit(*args)] = i
concurrent.futures.wait(futures)
def __del__(self):
self.executor.shutdown(False)
The multithreaded random number generator can be used to fill an array.
The values
attributes shows the zero-value before the fill and the
random value after.
In [2]: mrng = MultithreadedRNG(10000000, seed=0)
...: print(mrng.values[-1])
0.0
In [3]: mrng.fill()
...: print(mrng.values[-1])
3.296046120254392
The time required to produce using multiple threads can be compared to the time required to generate using a single thread.
In [4]: print(mrng.threads)
...: %timeit mrng.fill()
4
32.8 ms ± 2.71 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
The single threaded call directly uses the BitGenerator.
In [5]: values = np.empty(10000000)
...: rg = Generator(PCG64())
...: %timeit rg.standard_normal(out=values)
99.6 ms ± 222 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
The gains are substantial and the scaling is reasonable even for large that are only moderately large. The gains are even larger when compared to a call that does not use an existing array due to array creation overhead.
In [6]: rg = Generator(PCG64())
...: %timeit rg.standard_normal(10000000)
125 ms ± 309 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)