# Miscellaneous#

## IEEE 754 Floating Point Special Values#

Special values defined in numpy: nan, inf,

NaNs can be used as a poor-man’s mask (if you don’t care what the original value was)

Note: cannot use equality to test NaNs. E.g.:

```
>>> myarr = np.array([1., 0., np.nan, 3.])
>>> np.nonzero(myarr == np.nan)
(array([], dtype=int64),)
>>> np.nan == np.nan # is always False! Use special numpy functions instead.
False
>>> myarr[myarr == np.nan] = 0. # doesn't work
>>> myarr
array([ 1., 0., nan, 3.])
>>> myarr[np.isnan(myarr)] = 0. # use this instead find
>>> myarr
array([1., 0., 0., 3.])
```

Other related special value functions:

```
isinf(): True if value is inf
isfinite(): True if not nan or inf
nan_to_num(): Map nan to 0, inf to max float, -inf to min float
```

The following corresponds to the usual functions except that nans are excluded from the results:

```
nansum()
nanmax()
nanmin()
nanargmax()
nanargmin()
>>> x = np.arange(10.)
>>> x[3] = np.nan
>>> x.sum()
nan
>>> np.nansum(x)
42.0
```

## How numpy handles numerical exceptions#

The default is to `'warn'`

for `invalid`

, `divide`

, and `overflow`

and `'ignore'`

for `underflow`

. But this can be changed, and it can be
set individually for different kinds of exceptions. The different behaviors
are:

‘ignore’ : Take no action when the exception occurs.

‘warn’ : Print a

RuntimeWarning(via the Python`warnings`

module).‘raise’ : Raise a

FloatingPointError.‘call’ : Call a function specified using the

seterrcallfunction.‘print’ : Print a warning directly to

`stdout`

.‘log’ : Record error in a Log object specified by

seterrcall.

These behaviors can be set for all kinds of errors or specific ones:

all : apply to all numeric exceptions

invalid : when NaNs are generated

divide : divide by zero (for integers as well!)

overflow : floating point overflows

underflow : floating point underflows

Note that integer divide-by-zero is handled by the same machinery. These behaviors are set on a per-thread basis.

## Examples#

```
>>> oldsettings = np.seterr(all='warn')
>>> np.zeros(5,dtype=np.float32)/0.
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in divide
>>> j = np.seterr(under='ignore')
>>> np.array([1.e-100])**10
array([0.])
>>> j = np.seterr(invalid='raise')
>>> np.sqrt(np.array([-1.]))
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
FloatingPointError: invalid value encountered in sqrt
>>> def errorhandler(errstr, errflag):
... print("saw stupid error!")
>>> np.seterrcall(errorhandler)
>>> j = np.seterr(all='call')
>>> np.zeros(5, dtype=np.int32)/0
saw stupid error!
array([nan, nan, nan, nan, nan])
>>> j = np.seterr(**oldsettings) # restore previous
... # error-handling settings
```

## Interfacing to C#

Only a survey of the choices. Little detail on how each works.

Bare metal, wrap your own C-code manually.

Plusses:

Efficient

No dependencies on other tools

Minuses:

Lots of learning overhead:

need to learn basics of Python C API

need to learn basics of numpy C API

need to learn how to handle reference counting and love it.

Reference counting often difficult to get right.

getting it wrong leads to memory leaks, and worse, segfaults

Cython

Plusses:

avoid learning C API’s

no dealing with reference counting

can code in pseudo python and generate C code

can also interface to existing C code

should shield you from changes to Python C api

has become the de-facto standard within the scientific Python community

fast indexing support for arrays

Minuses:

Can write code in non-standard form which may become obsolete

Not as flexible as manual wrapping

ctypes

Plusses:

part of Python standard library

good for interfacing to existing shareable libraries, particularly Windows DLLs

avoids API/reference counting issues

good numpy support: arrays have all these in their ctypes attribute:

a.ctypes.data a.ctypes.data_as a.ctypes.shape a.ctypes.shape_as a.ctypes.strides a.ctypes.strides_asMinuses:

can’t use for writing code to be turned into C extensions, only a wrapper tool.

SWIG (automatic wrapper generator)

Plusses:

around a long time

multiple scripting language support

C++ support

Good for wrapping large (many functions) existing C libraries

Minuses:

generates lots of code between Python and the C code

can cause performance problems that are nearly impossible to optimize out

interface files can be hard to write

doesn’t necessarily avoid reference counting issues or needing to know API’s

Psyco

Plusses:

Turns pure python into efficient machine code through jit-like optimizations

very fast when it optimizes well

Minuses:

Only on intel (windows?)

Doesn’t do much for numpy?

## Interfacing to Fortran:#

The clear choice to wrap Fortran code is f2py.

Pyfort is an older alternative, but not supported any longer. Fwrap is a newer project that looked promising but isn’t being developed any longer.

## Interfacing to C++:#

Cython

CXX

Boost.python

SWIG

SIP (used mainly in PyQT)