Miscellaneous#
IEEE 754 floating point special values#
Special values defined in numpy: nan, inf,
NaNs can be used as a poor-man’s mask (if you don’t care what the original value was)
Note: cannot use equality to test NaNs. E.g.:
>>> myarr = np.array([1., 0., np.nan, 3.])
>>> np.nonzero(myarr == np.nan)
(array([], dtype=int64),)
>>> np.nan == np.nan # is always False! Use special numpy functions instead.
False
>>> myarr[myarr == np.nan] = 0. # doesn't work
>>> myarr
array([ 1., 0., nan, 3.])
>>> myarr[np.isnan(myarr)] = 0. # use this instead find
>>> myarr
array([1., 0., 0., 3.])
Other related special value functions:
isinf(): True if value is inf
isfinite(): True if not nan or inf
nan_to_num(): Map nan to 0, inf to max float, -inf to min float
The following corresponds to the usual functions except that nans are excluded from the results:
nansum()
nanmax()
nanmin()
nanargmax()
nanargmin()
>>> x = np.arange(10.)
>>> x[3] = np.nan
>>> x.sum()
nan
>>> np.nansum(x)
42.0
How numpy handles numerical exceptions#
The default is to 'warn'
for invalid
, divide
, and overflow
and 'ignore'
for underflow
. But this can be changed, and it can be
set individually for different kinds of exceptions. The different behaviors
are:
‘ignore’ : Take no action when the exception occurs.
‘warn’ : Print a RuntimeWarning (via the Python
warnings
module).‘raise’ : Raise a FloatingPointError.
‘call’ : Call a function specified using the seterrcall function.
‘print’ : Print a warning directly to
stdout
.‘log’ : Record error in a Log object specified by seterrcall.
These behaviors can be set for all kinds of errors or specific ones:
all : apply to all numeric exceptions
invalid : when NaNs are generated
divide : divide by zero (for integers as well!)
overflow : floating point overflows
underflow : floating point underflows
Note that integer divide-by-zero is handled by the same machinery. These behaviors are set on a per-thread basis.
Examples#
>>> oldsettings = np.seterr(all='warn')
>>> np.zeros(5,dtype=np.float32)/0.
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
RuntimeWarning: invalid value encountered in divide
>>> j = np.seterr(under='ignore')
>>> np.array([1.e-100])**10
array([0.])
>>> j = np.seterr(invalid='raise')
>>> np.sqrt(np.array([-1.]))
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
FloatingPointError: invalid value encountered in sqrt
>>> def errorhandler(errstr, errflag):
... print("saw stupid error!")
>>> np.seterrcall(errorhandler)
>>> j = np.seterr(all='call')
>>> np.zeros(5, dtype=np.int32)/0
saw stupid error!
array([nan, nan, nan, nan, nan])
>>> j = np.seterr(**oldsettings) # restore previous
... # error-handling settings
Interfacing to C#
Only a survey of the choices. Little detail on how each works.
Bare metal, wrap your own C-code manually.
Plusses:
Efficient
No dependencies on other tools
Minuses:
Lots of learning overhead:
need to learn basics of Python C API
need to learn basics of numpy C API
need to learn how to handle reference counting and love it.
Reference counting often difficult to get right.
getting it wrong leads to memory leaks, and worse, segfaults
Cython
Plusses:
avoid learning C API’s
no dealing with reference counting
can code in pseudo python and generate C code
can also interface to existing C code
should shield you from changes to Python C api
has become the de-facto standard within the scientific Python community
fast indexing support for arrays
Minuses:
Can write code in non-standard form which may become obsolete
Not as flexible as manual wrapping
ctypes
Plusses:
part of Python standard library
good for interfacing to existing shareable libraries, particularly Windows DLLs
avoids API/reference counting issues
good numpy support: arrays have all these in their ctypes attribute:
a.ctypes.data a.ctypes.data_as a.ctypes.shape a.ctypes.shape_as a.ctypes.strides a.ctypes.strides_asMinuses:
can’t use for writing code to be turned into C extensions, only a wrapper tool.
SWIG (automatic wrapper generator)
Plusses:
around a long time
multiple scripting language support
C++ support
Good for wrapping large (many functions) existing C libraries
Minuses:
generates lots of code between Python and the C code
can cause performance problems that are nearly impossible to optimize out
interface files can be hard to write
doesn’t necessarily avoid reference counting issues or needing to know API’s
Psyco
Plusses:
Turns pure python into efficient machine code through jit-like optimizations
very fast when it optimizes well
Minuses:
Only on intel (windows?)
Doesn’t do much for numpy?
Interfacing to Fortran:#
The clear choice to wrap Fortran code is f2py.
Pyfort is an older alternative, but not supported any longer. Fwrap is a newer project that looked promising but isn’t being developed any longer.
Interfacing to C++:#
Cython
CXX
Boost.python
SWIG
SIP (used mainly in PyQT)